The plaintiff submitted that various videos that were uploaded by Defendants 1 to 4, 6 and 7, had a message which portrayed to the viewers that consumption of Pulse Candy caused cancer. The plaintiff was a well-known manufacturer of various food products including candies under the brand name Rajnigandha, Catch, Pass-Pass, Chingles, Pulse, etc. Singh, J., ordered that all impugned videos shall be taken down, although if the defendants wish to upload another video about the candy, without sensationalizing the same based on third party, and based on scientifically verifiable test reports, then the defendants were free to do so. was the manufacturer of the popular candy, “Pulse” and had been aggrieved by the video uploaded by the defendants that contained false, distasteful, defamatory, and objectionable allegations against the product that it caused cancer, Prathiba M. Delhi High Court: In a case wherein the plaintiff, Dharampal Satyapal Foods Ltd.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |